<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 23, 2020, 23:30 by miketho16@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div>On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:34 PM Matthew Woehlke <<a href="mailto:mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">mwoehlke.floss@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div>><br></div><div><br></div><div>><br></div><div>> ...but then your horse is a passenger in a vehicle. Otherwise that would<br></div><div>> be like saying a human can't ride in a vehicle if foot=no.<br></div></div><div class="">Exactly, foot=no doesn't mean that feet are not allowed, it means that using a mode of transportation that primarily uses feet ("foot travel"/walking/running/hiking) isn't allowed.<br></div><div class="">bicycle=no is consistent with this, it doesn't mean that bicycles are prohibited, it means that a mode of transportation, (bicycle riding) is prohibited.<br></div><div class="">horse=no is apparently a little different as you point out. It seems to refer not just to a mode of transportation, but to the possession of the animal in general.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>Not exactly, typical motorway is horse=no but you can still transport horses in a truck.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""> It is similar to dog=no. dog=no doesn't refer to whether you can use a dog as a mode of transportation, it means you can't possess a dog at all on the given way (even if you carry it).<br></div><div class=""><br></div><div class=""><div><br></div><div>><br></div><div>> For similar reasons, I would assume that a way that allows vehicles but<br></div><div>> not pushed bicycles allows a bicycle *in* a vehicle.<br></div></div><div class="">Right, because it is no longer the mode of transportation.<br></div><div><br></div><div>> FWIW, I'm sympathetic to the "no means no" camp and just declaring that<br></div><div class="">> if you really meant "dismount", *fix it*.<br></div><div class="">well, "no does mean no", it means "no bicycle riding", it means, no using a bicycle as a mode of transportation. It doesn't say anything about possessing a bicycle in general, or using it in another manner (pushing, carrying)<br></div><div class="">"dismount" is not the complete solution, because, as the original question implied, sometimes it is also illegal to carry a bicycle (although I have never seen that), and as someone else pointed out, sometimes it is illegal to even possess a bicycle at all, such as in a US Wilderness Area.<br></div><div class=""><br></div><div>Mike<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>