<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>On 8/3/2020 4:36 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMPM96r=gt6seca-rjNNWBD-+MBKWK5kdnFCFBjExTj8qDy17w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 3, 2020, 15:29
Jmapb <<a href="mailto:jmapb@gmx.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">jmapb@gmx.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
...Regardless, if this general approach is considered
valid and<br>
workable, then I'd like to propose the following answer to
my original<br>
question:<br>
<br>
* Q) How should `addr:street` be tagged for an address
along an<br>
unnamed way which is part of a numbered road-type route
relation?<br>
* A) Check the way for alternative name tags. The
official postal<br>
version of the street name may be tagged as
`official_name`; if so<br>
that's a good value for `addr:street`. If the way has
other name tags --<br>
such as `alt_name`, `local_name`, `old_name`, or a
language-specific<br>
name -- those values may be used. It's also possible to
use the value of<br>
the way's `ref` tag, which should match the name of the
route relation.</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Name is only the name, so most route relations
wouldn't have a name.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Fair enough. The ones around me have names, but it looks like
plenty of them get by with just ref and network.</p>
<p>So...<br>
</p>
<p> * Q) How should `addr:street` be tagged for an address along an
unnamed way which is part of a numbered road-type route relation?<br>
* A) Check the way for alternative name tags. The official
postal version of the street name may be tagged as
`official_name`; if so that's a good value for `addr:street`. If
the way has other name tags -- such as `alt_name`, `local_name`,
`old_name`, or a language-specific name -- those values may be
used. It's also possible to use the value of the way's `ref` tag,
which should correspond to a route relation that includes the way.<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMPM96r=gt6seca-rjNNWBD-+MBKWK5kdnFCFBjExTj8qDy17w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">Since the
number of different variations on how one might address
something when the street name is on a numbered route, seems
like it's on the data consumer to fuzzy match appropriately
to match an imperfect hit.</span><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>I don't disagree, but I don't mind tagging more if it helps a
bit. <br>
</p>
<p>J<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>