<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>14 Aug 2020, 10:53 by ycai@mailbox.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:<br></div><blockquote><blockquote><div>I would define it as:<br></div><div><br></div><div>lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact elevation is not necessary to know, it's obvious)<br></div><div>upper_station: station that has the highest elevation<br></div><div>mid_station: any other station<br></div></blockquote><div>I want to add: At least in Germany, Switzerland and Austria there are well-established german words which you often find in the name of the stations themselves:<br></div><div><br></div><div>* "Talstation" ("valley station")<br></div><div>* "Bergstation" ("mountain station"), sometimes also "Gipfelstation" ("summit station")<br></div><div>* "Mittelstation" ("mid station")<br></div><div><br></div><div>There should be a machine-readeably tagging to get this information that is so often encoded in the name. That's why I'm suggesting this tagging.<br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div>Then why not valley / mid / mountain as values ? If the mountain station is lower than the mid- one, there is no discussion.<br></div></blockquote><div>Become bottom station may be <br></div><div>located not in the valley and top may<br></div><div>be on the hill, not mountain.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>