<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>It is nicer to avoid contradictions, but I am not planning to work on this specific case.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If you want you may propose specific edit and post it here for review <br></div><div>(or make it and discuss if someone disagrees).<br></div><div><br></div><div>"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 14, 2020, 20:35 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>So, should this contradiction be eliminated from the wiki or not?<br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div class="">Às 09:32 de 26/05/2020, Mateusz
Konieczny via Tagging escreveu:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Based on my experience it is usually better to write
something, even not ideal and<br></div><div>ask for a review.<br></div><div><br></div><div>"Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.<br></div><div><br></div><div>May 26, 2020, 10:58 by <a href="mailto:voschix@gmail.com" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">voschix@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div dir="ltr">Please come back to my original question: <i>I
would like to eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What
wording do you propose?</i><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23,
Jean-Marc Liotier <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:jm@liotier.org">jm@liotier.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px
solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br></div><div dir="auto"><div><div class=""><blockquote class="" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have
noticed that the JOSM style<br></div><div>that shows lane counts and lane use will
sometimes not show ways<br></div><div>properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but
that's probably a bug in the<br></div><div>style more than an indictment of implying
oneway=yes.<br></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I'm on the side of "team tag
explicitly" on this. If anything, it gives
validators more to work with if you start doing
something weird.<br></div></div></blockquote><p>Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?<br></p></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div><a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br></pre></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>