<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<tt>To make in unambiguous, the definition would then be:<br>
<br>
aerialway:station=base<br>
<br>
for the station at an end of the aerialway with the lower
altitude,<br>
<br>
aerialway:station=head<br>
<br>
for the station at the opposite end of the aerialway (hence with a
higher altitude) and<br>
<br>
aerialway:station=mid<br>
<br>
for any station not being at the end of and aerialway regardless
of the altitude.<br>
<br>
<br>
Anyone who wants to improve or oppose to this definition?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
dktue<br>
</tt><br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.08.2020 um 13:37 schrieb
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Werner.Haag@leitstelle.tirol">Werner.Haag@leitstelle.tirol</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:OF0EF4317C.2D72DF49-ONC12585C5.003C7C13-C12585C5.003FDC57@leitstelle.tirol">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Hi,</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">it was mentioned, we have many
aerialways in Tyrol and there are really cases where the mid
station is the one with the highest altitude.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">I found an example
("Schindlergratbahn", base 2035 m, mid 2643 m , head 2579 m,
see link ). So i think, the second scheme with base, mid,
head could</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">be the better scheme.</font><br>
<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23103020"
moz-do-not-send="true"><font size="3" face="serif"
color="#0000FF"><u>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23103020</u></font></a><font
size="3" face="serif"> </font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Werner</font><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">"Yves" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ycai@mailbox.org"><ycai@mailbox.org></a> schrieb am
14.08.2020 18:07:53:<br>
<br>
> Von: "Yves" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ycai@mailbox.org"><ycai@mailbox.org></a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and
related tools" <br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"><tagging@openstreetmap.org></a>, "Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging" <br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"><tagging@openstreetmap.org></a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Kopie: "Tagging"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"><tagging@openstreetmap.org></a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Datum: 14.08.2020 18:09</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re:
Aerialway stations</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I'm not a natural speaker, head like in where the
aerialway is heading.<br>
> I propose the second scheme because of the duplicate
meaning with <br>
> ele in the definition, and because the aim of an
aerialway could be <br>
> lower than mid. <br>
> Yves <br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Le 14 août 2020 17:32:08 GMT+02:00,
Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"><tagging@openstreetmap.org></a> a écrit :</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> I strongly prefer up/top over head.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> At least for me (not representative,</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> not a native speaker), head = up</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> is not clear.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> 14 Aug 2020, 17:05 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:email@daniel-korn.de">email@daniel-korn.de</a>:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a
definition:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> bottom: the end station with the lower
altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> up: the end station with the higher
altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> mid: any station, not being a base or a
head station, irrespective <br>
> of the altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Or, alternatively one that does not
compete with the ele tag and <br>
> carry a destination meaning (my preference):</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> base: the 'valley' station, usually with
the lower altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> head: the 'mountain' or 'top' station,
usually with the higher altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> mid: any station, not being a base or a
head station.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> aewrialway:station has my preference</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Yves</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> I like both. Any other people here with
a peference for one of Yves' schemes?<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Tagging mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</font></tt>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>