<html><body>
<p><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Hi,</font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">it was mentioned, we have many aerialways in Tyrol and there are really cases where the mid station is the one with the highest altitude.</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">I found an example ("Schindlergratbahn", base 2035 m, mid 2643 m , head 2579 m, see link ). So i think, the second scheme with base, mid, head could</font><br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">be the better scheme.</font><br>
<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23103020"><font size="3" color="#0000FF" face="serif"><u>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23103020</u></font></a><font size="3" face="serif"> </font><br>
<br>
<font size="2" face="sans-serif">Werner</font><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">"Yves" <ycai@mailbox.org> schrieb am 14.08.2020 18:07:53:<br>
<br>
> Von: "Yves" <ycai@mailbox.org></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <br>
> <tagging@openstreetmap.org>, "Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging" <br>
> <tagging@openstreetmap.org></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Kopie: "Tagging" <tagging@openstreetmap.org></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Datum: 14.08.2020 18:09</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I'm not a natural speaker, head like in where the aerialway is heading.<br>
> I propose the second scheme because of the duplicate meaning with <br>
> ele in the definition, and because the aim of an aerialway could be <br>
> lower than mid. <br>
> Yves <br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Le 14 août 2020 17:32:08 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <br>
> <tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> I strongly prefer up/top over head.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> At least for me (not representative,</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> not a native speaker), head = up</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> is not clear.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> 14 Aug 2020, 17:05 by email@daniel-korn.de:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> bottom: the end station with the lower altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> up: the end station with the higher altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> mid: any station, not being a base or a head station, irrespective <br>
> of the altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Or, alternatively one that does not compete with the ele tag and <br>
> carry a destination meaning (my preference):</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> base: the 'valley' station, usually with the lower altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> head: the 'mountain' or 'top' station, usually with the higher altitude</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> mid: any station, not being a base or a head station.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> aewrialway:station has my preference</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> Yves</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> I like both. Any other people here with a peference for one of Yves' schemes?<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Tagging mailing list<br>
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</font></tt></body></html>