<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>I would expect roundabout to be split in parts where<br></div><div>ref is applying and parts where it is not applying, in other words<br></div><div>without any special handling and tag it as usual.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 22, 2020, 12:06 by f@zz.de:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div>Hi,<br></div><div>there is a little Discussion in the German forum concerning ref<br></div><div>tagging on Roundabouts. After looking at the Wiki again somebody<br></div><div>added (In April 2019) a section saying refs of the roads should <br></div><div>continue on the ways with "junction=roundabout":<br></div><div><br></div><div> "[[File:Roundabout_Ref_Consistency.png|thumb|Roundabout with ref tagging<br></div><div> consistent with connecting roads]] For roundabouts that have ways either<br></div><div> continuing through, or ending at the roundabout, {{Tag|ref}} and<br></div><div> {{Tag|int_ref}} tags from those ways should be added to that roundabout.<br></div><div> This allows routing to navigate through the roundabout more fluidly."<br></div><div><br></div><div>Has this been discussed somewhere? This is highly inconsistant with<br></div><div>the name meaning the roundabout and the ref not meaning the roundabout.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I strongly disagree with this section and i doubt there has been some <br></div><div>concensus about this so i would like to revert this.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Flo<br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Florian Lohoff f@zz.de<br></div><div> UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>