<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 12.8px;">The fact that the image is linked to an osm node is enough reason for the image to be online.</span></font></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Sorry, I meant that images of generic drinking fountains can go in ‘Drinking fountains in <location>’ and only need one image linked to the node. <div>A unique fountain deserves its own category <br><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:53, Thibault Molleman <thibaultmolleman@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Can you link photos/deletion requests?</blockquote><div>Again, don't bother with that. I was 13, didn't know what I was doing, main reason why they were deleted according to the deletion requests were because they didn't have a license attached to them, so they didn't know if it was even allowed on there. (wouldn't happen with todays upload wizard)</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">Assuming the drinking fountains are unique</span></blockquote><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px">I feel like it just shouldn't matter if they are unique. We shouldn't have to justify why an image is important. </span></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px">The fact that the image is linked to an osm node is enough reason for the image to be online. But the problem is that Wikimedia wouldn't care for such a reason.</span></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px">So that is the reason why I would always <a href="http://archive.org">archive.org</a> images I'd put on Commons probably</span></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Cheers,</span></font></div><div><font face="sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Thibault</span></font></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 14:45 Jake Edmonds via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I feel like those examples (city gates and fountains) would be appropriate places to use a wikimedia category. <br>
<br>
Assuming the drinking fountains are unique, if not then do they need multiple photos? <br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone<br>
<br>
> On 26 Aug 2020, at 14:29, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> sent from a phone<br>
> <br>
>> On 26. Aug 2020, at 12:18, bkil <<a href="http://bkil.hu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">bkil.hu</a>+<a href="mailto:Aq@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">Aq@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> there is usually no need for more than one image on a POI<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> I have recently tagged some city gates and both sides would have been interesting. The other kind of POI I am frequently taking photos are fountains and drinking fountains, where indeed a single foto is completely sufficient in almost all cases. It’s not generally answerable.<br>
> <br>
> Cheers Martin <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Tagging mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Tagging mailing list</span><br><span>Tagging@openstreetmap.org</span><br><span>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>