<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>"by policy they _should_ delete the lower quality image if a better quality image is also available"</div><div>only when it is an exact duplicate - not just photo of the same object<br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 26, 2020, 21:45 by bkil.hu+Aq@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Didn't we have an OSM tool in the past that showed points with broken links? (Also I think the citations I've given earlier a few hours ago should clear up what should or should not be deleted - by policy they _should_ delete the lower quality image if a better quality image is also available)<br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:49 PM Paul Allen <<a href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">pla16021@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 19:39, Mateusz Konieczny <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><br></div><div><div>In practice you need horrific image quality,<br></div><div>to the point of unasibility for deletion to <br></div><div>succeed<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>So maybe the chance of deletion is low enough that we can drop the<br></div><div>argument that "wikimedia might delete it" when discussing using<br></div><div>wikimedia images.<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><div><div><br></div><div>They have backlog of copyright violations,<br></div><div>and tricky cases where legality is not clear.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ah, in that case we might need a bot that works in the other direction.<br></div><div>Not one that tells wikimedia we've used one of its images but one<br></div><div>that tells us that one of the wikimedia images we used has gone.<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><div><div>People making backlog worse by making<br></div><div>such "low quality, delete" would not be<br></div><div>appreciated or encouraged there<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We don't appreciate or encourage people who make ill-judged<br></div><div>edits to the map, but it happens.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Paul<br></div><div><br></div></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Tagging mailing list<br></div><div> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>