<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/4/2020 2:10 PM, Martin
Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTDuBZBem5+FPRNteZkseinU3AZcepc5aBBCAER99Wk1FQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Fr., 4. Sept. 2020 um
19:03 Uhr schrieb Jmapb via Tagging <<a
href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 9/4/2020 11:34 AM,
Jmapb via Tagging wrote:<br>
> The "See also" section of that page seems to suggest
the undocumented<br>
> tag `contact:webcam` for this purpose.<br>
<br>
(Mea culpa, contact:webcam is indeed documented on the
contact page.)</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>according to the "contact" webpage it is a tag for tagging
"contacts". Is a live stream of a camera a "contact"?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In a loose sense, perhaps, you are "contacting" the webcam by
requesting that URL... but it's a stretch.</p>
<p>If I were proposing a tag, I'd probably say `camera:url` or
`webcam:url`. But `contact:webcam` is documented and in popular
use all over the world.</p>
<p>J<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>