<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>I always understood<br></div><div>highway=crossing + bicycle=no<br></div><div>tagging to mean "you cannot use this crossing to cross road while cycling,<br></div><div>it does not affect legality of cycling on the road"<br></div><div><br></div><div>Used when <br></div><div>(1) cycleway or footway with allowed cycling is interrupted by<br></div><div>crossing where cyclists are obligated to dismount<br></div><div>(2) there is cycleway/footway with allowed cycling on both sides of<br></div><div>road, it is tagged as cycleway:left/cycleway:right/cycleway:both<br></div><div>and there is pedestrian only crossing at some point<br></div><div>(cyclist cannot switch sides without dismounting)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Or is it a tagging that means "you must dismount while either<br></div><div>using crossing and while cycling on the road", <br></div><div>making this basically useless.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am asking as there was discussion on OSM Wiki between me<br></div><div>and one other person, with recent edits to OSM Wiki that seems<br></div><div>to misrepresent real tagging practice.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am considering reverting them, but I wanted to ask here whatever<br></div><div>what I think about tagging practice matches what other consider<br></div><div>as consensus.<br></div><div><br></div><div>See<br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:highway%3Dcrossing&action=history">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:highway%3Dcrossing&action=history</a><br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing#highway.3Dcrossing_with_bicycle.3Dno">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing#highway.3Dcrossing_with_bicycle.3Dno</a><br></div><div>for OSM Wiki links<br></div> </body>
</html>