<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>9 paź 2020, 15:33 od baloo@ursamundi.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:06 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div>For me it sounds sort-of similar (the same definition, just swap "motor vehicle" with "bicycle",<br></div><div>or use "vehicle" to cover both ) but with drastically different functionality.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Similarly like "parking" and "bicycle parking" or "motorway" and "cycleway".<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div> Eeeh, motorway and cycleway make sense because they're definitely two fairly different beasts, but for amenities and parking, motor_vehicle=no, bicycle=designated seems like a better idea in retrospect.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><div>I guess that it depends on personal<br></div><div>preferences.<br></div><div><div><br></div></div><div>I really dislike need to enter multiple tags<br></div><div>to specify basic type (yes I like<br></div><div>highway=bus_stop)<br></div></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>