<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 10. Oct 2020, at 17:36, Dave F via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Why would train drivers, looking at OSM, need to have just a couple
of signals enclosed inside a polygon?<br></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>did you already have the occasion to ask commuters in your part of the world whether they believe the parts of a train station that are not accessible for the passengers are outside or inside of the station?</div><div><br></div><div>Are you mapping train stations as areas? From reading your replies here the impression I get is you are advocating for not extending the representation from a node to an area, right? I do not understand why you are fighting so hard to make a tag useless/superfluous (same meaning as public_transport=station) which you do not even use in this way, and without offering an alternative, all allegedly just for the benefit of the “ordinary people” from whom you suppose to have a distorted view of the situation, so they are not confused?</div><div><span style="-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; font-family: "Open Sans", sans-serif; font-size: 20px; white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(233, 234, 235);"><br></span></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></body></html>