<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
On 15/10/2020 11:01, OSM wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c9763214-a06c-659f-3411-17bb6e046269@bavarianmallet.de">
<br>
<br>
Am 10.10.2020 um 00:35 schrieb Dave F via Tagging:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
I edited a copy of the diagram (A-simple-station.svg) of a
station layout, primarily to remove any references to PTv2 tags,
a completely independent, duplicating tagging schema, irrelevant
to anything to do with the railway=station tag.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That is the main problem I think:
<br>
You think, that railway=* and PTv2 tags are duplicating tagging
schemas.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
They are. One of the creators on the Transit forum stated the
intention was for PTy2 to supersede railway=* tags.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c9763214-a06c-659f-3411-17bb6e046269@bavarianmallet.de">
<br>
But:
<br>
railway=* are _railway_ related tags - they are for
infrastructure.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Which wiki pages claim that?<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c9763214-a06c-659f-3411-17bb6e046269@bavarianmallet.de">PTv2
tags are _public_transport_ tags - they are for the public
transport use cases.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Tell that to the contributors who are adding PTv2 to tourist
stations (I think it might be to do with another cock-up in iD
editor)<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c9763214-a06c-659f-3411-17bb6e046269@bavarianmallet.de">
<br>
And yes - these both are truly different.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Which negates any desire to change the meaning of railway=station
from "places where customers can access railway services or where
goods are loaded and unloaded.<tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"></bdi></tt>"<br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
</body>
</html>