<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MJgE_rW--3-2@tutanota.com">
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Imagine I would add hgv=no or motorcycle=no tags to
pedestrian crossings<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Is there a case where hgv use sidewalk together with
pedestrians and cross road using crossing shared with a
pedestrians?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is there a case of sidewalk where hgv are allowed but on
crossing with road oneis supposed to walk carrying your<br>
</div>
<div>vehicle?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is there some existing usage of hgv=noon crossings?</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Valid questions, but the exact same questions apply for a
pedestrian way crossing a secondary. On that pedestrian way
cyclists are not allowed so what is the use of adding bicycle=no
to the crossing node?<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MJgE_rW--3-2@tutanota.com">
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>, IMHO this would be as correct as adding bicycle=no,
because neither of them can cross at the pedestrian
crossing, but overall it could be seen as very bad tagging
because of the ambiguity (for the road users).</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Agreed.<br>
</body>
</html>