<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 15, 2020, 22:30 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Imagine I would add hgv=no or motorcycle=no tags to
pedestrian crossings<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Is there a case where hgv use sidewalk together with
pedestrians and cross road using crossing shared with a
pedestrians?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Is there a case of sidewalk where hgv are allowed but on
crossing with road oneis supposed to walk carrying your<br></div><div>vehicle?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Is there some existing usage of hgv=noon crossings?<br></div></blockquote><p>Valid questions, but the exact same questions apply for a
pedestrian way crossing a secondary. On that pedestrian way
cyclists are not allowed so what is the use of adding bicycle=no
to the crossing node?<br></p></blockquote><div>I agree that adding bicycle=no on highway=crossing is pointless on footways with bicycle=no or<br></div><div>where bicycle=no is implied<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is useful solely if cyclists are allowed on cycleway/footway crossing road and are obligated to<br></div><div>dismount if crossing road at that point. (and yes, in most cases, though not all, it can be retagged as<br></div><div>access tagging on way)<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>