<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 18, 2020, 01:53 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 17. Oct 2020, at 21:01, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>Nevertheless some crossings were mapped using highway=cycleway and bicycle=no on crossing<br></div><div>nodes, probably because it is much less fiddly to map it.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Yes I know, one possible outcome of this discussion here would be agreeing that this representation bears some problems and that we suggest a less error prone alternative is chosen.<br></div></blockquote><div>I agree that splitting road is preferable.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Still, highway=crossing bicycle=no is an acceptable tagging (like you can map cemeteries or parks<br></div><div>or churches as nodes in the first pass, especially when there is no good aerial imagery available)<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>