<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Yes, latest update date can be a hint<br></div><div>but treating it is as an argument to avoid<br></div><div>making an edit is really weird to me.</div><div><br></div><div>19 paź 2020, 14:51 od tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>I'm in no way supporting the proposal, but this argument of 'it'll
make the entities look fully up to date" is illogical. If taken to
it's conclusion, nothing will ever be update again.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> It's false to think that just because an entity was amended
yesterday, it means it's up to date:<br></div><div> If a typo in a road's name is amended, but the road is left
incorrectly tagged as 'tertiary' instead of 'primary' it's not up to
date.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> Likewise an entity previously amended 10 years ago doesn't mean it's
inaccurate.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> DaveF<br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div class="">On 18/10/2020 22:04, Oliver Simmons
wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="auto"><div>Doing this would make over 3M objects have their
date updated to the present, when the last meaningful change may
have been over 5 years ago. <br></div><div dir="auto">It creates the illusion of data being up-to-date
when all that was changed was a tag key.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div dir="auto" class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, 22:02
Graeme Fitzpatrick, <<a href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at
20:39, Rory McCann <<a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="mailto:rory@technomancy.org">rory@technomancy.org</a>>
wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px
0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class="">*definitely* not
something one does auomatically.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>But would it be so impossible? (Not suggesting that
it should actually be done!) <br></div><div><br></div><div>Couldn't a bot be set to simply find all cases of
man_made=, regardless of what it is, & change them
to human_made=, similar to using Find & Replace in
a Word document?<br></div><div><br></div><div>& no, as you can see, I don't understand the
technicalities behind it all, so please be gentle with
explaining that I'm an idiot! :-)<br></div><div><br></div><div><div>Thanks <br></div><div><br></div><div>Graeme<br></div></div><div><br></div></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Tagging mailing list<br></div><div> <a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></div><div><br></div><pre wrap="" class="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br></pre></blockquote></blockquote> </body>
</html>