<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>19 paź 2020, 10:27 od dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 18. Oct 2020, at 10:39, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>Still, highway=crossing bicycle=no is an acceptable tagging (like you can map cemeteries or parks<br></div><div>or churches as nodes in the first pass, especially when there is no good aerial imagery available)<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>my preference is deprecating this as it has too many risks, not worth the benefit of informing cyclists whether they have to push 4 meters or can drive on the crossing.<br></div></blockquote><div>"not worth benefit" <br></div><div><br></div><div>As a cyclist - this is a critically important info.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Dismounting on every crossing is<br></div><div>extremely annoying.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Car equivalent would be stopping car, leaving it and entering again - even if <br></div><div>traffic light is green!</div> </body>
</html>