<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Can you link actual scientific publication?<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am willing to change my mind but<br></div><div>I would need to check is it tested on<br></div><div>some sane sample of people, not<br></div><div>"Canadian males going to university with me"<br></div><div><br></div><div>(psychology scientific papers are<br></div><div>often only "scientific".<br></div><div> <br></div><div>So I am not going<br></div><div>to treat seriously one that is not<br></div><div>documenting properly its methodology,<br></div><div>especially info how interviewed people<br></div><div>were selected and whatever sample size<br></div><div>was of serious size rather than <br></div><div>"Sample size was 10, I interviewed<br></div><div>my family and friends".<br></div><div><br></div><div>See also replication crisis mess, where <br></div><div>turned out that many highly cited and <br></div><div>widely promoted papers in sociology and<br></div><div>psychology were worthless (yes, I am <br></div><div>salty about believing in Ted talk about<br></div><div>power pose that was based on misleading<br></div><div>claims)</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>21 Oct 2020, 06:57 by robert@rtbk.com.au:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>'her generic man' has been fixed - it was a typo.<br></div><div><br></div><div>now reads:<br></div><div><span style=""><span class="font" style="font-family:sans-serif"><span class="size" style="font-size:14px">"confirmed that when people read or hear the generic version of 'man', people form mental pictures of males"</span></span></span><br></div></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>