<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Thank you, Joseph.<br>
    <br>
    If no one opposes, I'll do just that.<br>
    Regards.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 16:43 de 12/11/2020, Joseph
      Eisenberg escreveu:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPhLFkt5YJf6HVnrgCxDUD9OrpWG906r5-8HJcB96ryHhw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">Since the tag man_made=threshing_floor has
          already been used 7 times (<a
            href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=threshing_floor#values"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=threshing_floor#values</a>)
          you can create a page to document this, however, you would
          also need to mention that historic=threshing_floor is much
          more common (actually landuse=threshing_floor is also equally
          common), and it would probably be fair to create a
          historic=threshing_floor wiki page too, in that case. </div>
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
        </div>
        <div>If you want to suggest deprecating historic=threshing_floor
          and replacing it with man_made=threshing_floor, or otherwise
          changing existing common usage, you should make a proposal so
          that the community can discuss this.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>-- Joseph Eisenberg</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:53
          PM António Madeira via Tagging <<a
            href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
            moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div> So, given that most of those who commented this thread
            agreed that threshing_floor should be in the man_made
            scheme, should I add it to the wiki or create a Feature
            Proposal?<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <div>Às 19:27 de 06/11/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 21:53, Martin
                Koppenhoefer <<a href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
                wrote:<br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                    0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div class="gmail_quote">
                        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Fr., 6.
                          Nov. 2020 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen <<a
                            href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">pla16021@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
                        </div>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                          style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div dir="ltr">On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 09:09,
                              Martin Koppenhoefer <<a
                                href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
                                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
                              wrote:<br>
                            </div>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">...
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                          style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                            style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                            <div dir="ltr">
                              <div>To me it doesn't make sense to draw a
                                line, dividing the same objects having
                                more or less historic value. If there is
                                something to distinguish at all, my
                                suggestion would be to add a qualifier
                                to those objects of exceptional
                                historical value (if this is
                                verifiable).</div>
                            </div>
                          </blockquote>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <div>We have a way of tagging objects of
                            exceptional historical value, it's</div>
                          <div>historic=*.  Objects of unexceptional
                            historical value, or of no historical</div>
                          <div>value do not get tagged with historic=*. 
                            That's because historic is</div>
                          <div>not a synonym (in the real world or in
                            tagging) for old, disused or</div>
                          <div>repurposed.</div>
                        </blockquote>
                      </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>just that it is not what we are currently
                        doing.</div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </blockquote>
                  <div>That is not what some of us are currently doing. 
                    Others read the wiki page</div>
                  <div>and tag accordingly.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>It occurs to me that some of the mis-tagging (as
                    I see it) and some of the</div>
                  <div>discussions here may revolve around semantics as
                    interpreted by</div>
                  <div>those who do not have English as a first
                    language.  There is a</div>
                  <div>difference between "historical" and "historic."</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Historians are concerned with historical data. 
                    Old data (about</div>
                  <div>populations, diseases or whatever) is historical
                    data.  The</div>
                  <div> assassination of a minor archduke, which seemed
                    unimportant</div>
                  <div>at the time, quickly turned into a historic
                    event.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>When somebody says that "historic" applies to
                    everything that</div>
                  <div>historians do, that is incorrect.  What
                    historians mostly do is</div>
                  <div>look at historical data, some small fraction of
                    which is</div>
                  <div>also historic.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>See <a
                      href="https://www.grammarly.com/blog/historic-historical/"
                      target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.grammarly.com/blog/historic-historical/<br>
                    </a></div>
                  <div>for a better explanation.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>So historic=* really should only apply (as the
                    wiki page states) to the important</div>
                  <div>things of the past, not everything some random
                    historian might happen</div>
                  <div>to be looking into.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>So the question is, do we accept that because
                    some mappers have misused</div>
                  <div>the tag we should encourage that misuse or do we
                    discourage it?</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>-- <br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Paul</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset></fieldset>
              <pre>_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Tagging mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>