<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
I am surprised nobody has suggested a pondness or lakicity scale yet.<br></blockquote><div> </div>It isn't unusual outside of OSM for relative percentages of the different meanings to be accounted for. For example for Great Pond ( <a href="https://www.topoquest.com/map.php?lat=44.53333&lon=-69.83333&datum=nad83&zoom=16" target="_blank">https://www.topoquest.com/map.php?lat=44.53333&lon=-69.83333&datum=nad83&zoom=16</a> ) with a surface area of 13 square miles</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">lake 15%</div><div class="gmail_quote">reservoir 84%   ( volume added to the original lake by the dam ) <br></div><div class="gmail_quote">pond 1%<br></div><div id="m_-6680278241776399936DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><table style="border-top:1px solid #d3d4de"><tbody><tr><td style="width:55px;padding-top:13px"><br></td><td style="width:470px;padding-top:12px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:18px">
                <br></td>
        </tr>
</tbody></table><a href="#m_-6680278241776399936_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div></div>