<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Wiki created:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dthreshing_floor">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dthreshing_floor</a><br>
<br>
Please comment and/or edit accordingly.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 17:53 de 12/11/2020, António Madeira
via Tagging escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:0ccfb0a5-a816-a0c4-28a2-f3e6c804cadb@gmx.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Thank you, Joseph.<br>
<br>
If no one opposes, I'll do just that.<br>
Regards.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 16:43 de 12/11/2020, Joseph
Eisenberg escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP_2vPhLFkt5YJf6HVnrgCxDUD9OrpWG906r5-8HJcB96ryHhw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Since the tag man_made=threshing_floor has
already been used 7 times (<a
href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=threshing_floor#values"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=threshing_floor#values</a>)
you can create a page to document this, however, you would
also need to mention that historic=threshing_floor is much
more common (actually landuse=threshing_floor is also
equally common), and it would probably be fair to create a
historic=threshing_floor wiki page too, in that case. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div>If you want to suggest
deprecating historic=threshing_floor and replacing it with
man_made=threshing_floor, or otherwise changing existing
common usage, you should make a proposal so that the
community can discuss this.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- Joseph Eisenberg</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:53
PM António Madeira via Tagging <<a
href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> So, given that most of those who commented this thread
agreed that threshing_floor should be in the man_made
scheme, should I add it to the wiki or create a Feature
Proposal?<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>Às 19:27 de 06/11/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 21:53, Martin
Koppenhoefer <<a
href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Fr., 6.
Nov. 2020 um 13:56 Uhr schrieb Paul Allen
<<a href="mailto:pla16021@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">pla16021@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at
09:09, Martin Koppenhoefer <<a
href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">...
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>To me it doesn't make sense to draw
a line, dividing the same objects
having more or less historic value. If
there is something to distinguish at
all, my suggestion would be to add a
qualifier to those objects of
exceptional historical value (if this
is verifiable).</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We have a way of tagging objects of
exceptional historical value, it's</div>
<div>historic=*. Objects of unexceptional
historical value, or of no historical</div>
<div>value do not get tagged with
historic=*. That's because historic is</div>
<div>not a synonym (in the real world or in
tagging) for old, disused or</div>
<div>repurposed.</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>just that it is not what we are currently
doing.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>That is not what some of us are currently
doing. Others read the wiki page</div>
<div>and tag accordingly.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It occurs to me that some of the mis-tagging
(as I see it) and some of the</div>
<div>discussions here may revolve around semantics
as interpreted by</div>
<div>those who do not have English as a first
language. There is a</div>
<div>difference between "historical" and "historic."</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Historians are concerned with historical data.
Old data (about</div>
<div>populations, diseases or whatever) is
historical data. The</div>
<div> assassination of a minor archduke, which
seemed unimportant</div>
<div>at the time, quickly turned into a historic
event.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>When somebody says that "historic" applies to
everything that</div>
<div>historians do, that is incorrect. What
historians mostly do is</div>
<div>look at historical data, some small fraction of
which is</div>
<div>also historic.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>See <a
href="https://www.grammarly.com/blog/historic-historical/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.grammarly.com/blog/historic-historical/<br>
</a></div>
<div>for a better explanation.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So historic=* really should only apply (as the
wiki page states) to the important</div>
<div>things of the past, not everything some random
historian might happen</div>
<div>to be looking into.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So the question is, do we accept that because
some mappers have misused</div>
<div>the tag we should encourage that misuse or do
we discourage it?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- <br>
</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>