<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I was actually thinking of the type of battery, i.e. flywheel,
LiOn, etc. Although it would probably also be interesting to
figure out a tagging scheme to classify batteries by type,
capacity etc. for the future. And it's true that :grid,
:generator, and :battery as second namespaces are redundant if the
source keys can be restricted to only being usable if the
corresponding infrastructure key is used. <br>
</p>
<p>The only issue I see with separating the tagging like this if the
general source of electricity is advertised (e.g. 'renewable' in a
supermarket and you can't determine if that's because they're
connected to the grid or they have a small wind turbine out
back..rather unlikely but still). I think that it's likely easy to
tell or would also be advertised if they had a local generator. Or
perhaps would then have to be left untagged.</p>
<p> If you'd like to add such a table to the wiki, feel free! :)<br>
</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Lukas<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15.11.20 01:49, François Lacombe
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG0ygLcoxx5=mmQd5y4ZyPWrbgSRGXw8GJZb_tw=P_zP4aWJAA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Lukas,<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le sam. 14 nov. 2020
à 21:00, Lukas Richert <<a
href="mailto:lrichert@posteo.net" moz-do-not-send="true">lrichert@posteo.net</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hi François,</p>
<p>I do actually like the word input for generator and
have been thinking that 'battery:origin' makes no sense
either to specify the type of origin. Keys such as
'electricity:grid:origin=*',
'electricity:generator:input=*', and
'electricity:battery:type=*' would be more distinct and
would separate them. My only problem with that is that
the wikipage would probably need a flowchart to explain
the tagging :/ What do you think?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>That's an interesting point.</div>
<div>Do you mean electricity:battery:type should refer to the
source of electricity that feeds the battery?</div>
<div>Let's keep in mind that batteries are probably charged
with the same electricity used in place.</div>
<div>It won't change anything regarding origin or local supply
source quality (electricity won't become greener).<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think electricity:origin is enough, no need to add
:grid inside but only restrict its usage with
electricity:grid=yes, for sake of simplicity.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>With a simpler origin definition, a table would be
enough.<br>
</div>
<div>A table similar to Infrastructure table could be
completed to give the applicable tagging suitable for each
Infrastructure situation</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Let me know how do you feel and I could try to propose
something for this table</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>All the best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>François</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>