<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 20, 2020, 11:47 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">Am Fr., 20. Nov. 2020 um 11:28 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <<a href="mailto:matkoniecz@tutanota.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">matkoniecz@tutanota.com</a>>:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div>This seems unlikely, with 0 lanes it would mean that cars inside are blocked<br></div><div>and unable to leave.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>that's not the meaning of "lanes", lanes=0 would mean that there are no traffic lanes. (this is what the wiki says about "lanes"). <br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>With two parking lanes and 0 traffic lanes cars would be unable to leave, as both lanes would<br></div><div>be filled with cars and there would be no space to drive.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If there are two parking lanes and there is still space for a single driving lane<br></div><div>then it would be lanes=1 <br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div>IMHO these are 2 lanes, clearly marked on the ground. I do not see a reason for one lane to be seen as parking lane only.<br></div><div>Even if it is both de facto pernament parking lane and parking in this way is legal?<br></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>as long as cars do not have to stop in order to pass each other, yes. I agree the width of the road is restricted, but if opposite traffic can continuously pass, it is 2 lanes according to the current wiki ("how many traffic lanes there are on a highway.")<br></div></div></blockquote><div>I would also tag as lanes=2<br></div><div><br></div><div>But what about case raised by Tobias where there is no space for that?<br></div><div><a href="https://westnordost.de/misc/2or1lanes.jpg">https://westnordost.de/misc/2or1lanes.jpg</a> <br></div><div><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-November/056322.html">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-November/056322.html</a><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Another question that comes to mind, now that we have removed the requirement for road markings. In a situation where 3 lanes are marked, but vehicles ignore the marked lanes and actually drive in 4 lanes, would you tag this as 3 or 4 lanes?<br></div></div></blockquote><div>No idea. I would probably treat marking as overriding and tag 3 and invent new tag for de facto lane<br></div><div>count.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And probably also petition local government to redraw too wide lanes if that would be <br></div><div>applicable.<br></div> </body>
</html>