<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 1, 2020, 00:44 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">Am Di., 1. Dez. 2020 um 00:39 Uhr schrieb Lukas Richert <<a href="mailto:lrichert@posteo.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">lrichert@posteo.net</a>>:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><p>I wouldn't tag this as foot=no or access=no. There are many
trails in my area that are clearly animal tracks and seldom used
by people - but it is allowed for people to walk on these and they
are sometimes significant shortcuts so allowing routing over them
in some cases would be good. <br></p></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>+1<br></div></div></blockquote><div>+1, though in cases of protected areas with "do not leave signed trails" rules, access=no<br></div><div>would be a viable tagging<br></div> </body>
</html>