<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 13, 2020, 19:58 by anders@torger.se:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>Do you have a suggestion of how to map Sweden's highest mountain, Kebnekaise?<br></p><p>The mountain is called Kebnekaise, it has two peaks, one is called "Sydtoppen" ("the south peak"), the other "Nordtoppen" ("the north peak").<br></p></blockquote><div>I admit that I have no good idea, if I would run into such case and failed to find a better idea<br></div><div>(hopefully one will come) I would invent a new way to tag that.<br></div><div><br></div><div>natural=mountain? Main problem is where to put it - node at arbitrary position between peaks?<br></div><div>Node at location of highest peak? Area? Relation? All of that is sadly problematic.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>(The mountain_range tag is a great tag, but I note that its status is just "in use", it's not an approved tag :-O.)<br></p></blockquote><div>It is perfectly fine to use tags that never went through tagging proposal, though<br></div><div>I am not going to endorse this one. Tagging mountain ranges seems to poorly fit OSM<br></div><div>with multiple different opinions where mountain range starts/ends and inability to<br></div><div>verify it by survey.<br></div><div><br></div><div>All tags were in some stage rarely used before becoming heavily used,<br></div><div>only some cases went through a proposal process.<br></div> </body>
</html>