<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 13, 2020, 18:46 by tomasstraupis@gmail.com:<br></div><div><br></div><div>Please first stop quoting me in way that presents your<br></div><div>statements under my autorship<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>2020-12-13, sk, 19:18 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging rašė:<br></div><div>Mateusz, can you point out which of my claims is a lie?<br></div></blockquote><div>"<i><i>iD coders decided to skip standard IT processes of product development</i></i><br></div><div><i><i> (or were not familiar with the basics of IT)"</i></i><br></div><div><br></div><div>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br></div><div>"coders of iD decided to lie to the users that landuse=reservoir is<br></div><div>deprecated which it never was"<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is deprecated by 2011 proposal, see
<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details#Deprecation" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details#Deprecation</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> I didn't say iD invented duplicate schema, I said that schema was<br></div><div>lying dead until iD decided to introduce it as the only way to tag<br></div><div>water, introduction "launched" new water schema adding any<br></div><div>considerable usage (as it was the only option for iD mappers).<br></div></blockquote><div>OK, this one was based on miscommunication.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> Introducing duplicate and unused schema (especially as the only<br></div><div>option) is not a good IT decision<br></div></blockquote><div>It was not an unused schema.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>usage/requirements must lead technical decisions. That is IT BASICS.<br></div></blockquote><div>It was not an unused schema and it was proposed, approved and used before iD<br></div><div>started using it and later aggressively promoting it.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> and introduced<br></div></blockquote><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote><div>water=reservoir as the only way to tag, all this at the time when<br></div><div>water=reservoir usage was close to zero!<br></div><div><br></div><div>See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/water=reservoir#chronology<br></div><div><br></div><div>Usage in January 2019 was about 200 000 already.<br></div><div><br></div><div>"water=reservoir usage was close to zero" is untrue<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Key word "introduced" so it is 2012, not 2019.<br></div><div> water=reservoir usage in 2012 is close to zero.<br></div></blockquote><div>Then iD followed a fresh approved proposal, so relatively low<br></div><div>usage is not surprising.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Though it is a rare case when I encounter complaint about iD<br></div><div>developers following outcome of a proposal process.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote><div>It is deprecated by 2011 proposal, see<br></div><div>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details#Deprecation<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The author of this proposal agreed that standard water schema is NOT<br></div><div>deprecated. <br></div></blockquote><div>It is not changing that this vote deprecated landuse=reservoir.<br></div><div>Maybe it is a bad decision that should be ignored, but<br></div><div>it is not changing that deprecation happened.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>And a few people voting in wiki cannot deprecate a tag.<br></div></blockquote><div>That is one of methods to deprecate tag, even if you dislike it.<br></div> </body>
</html>