<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 12, 2020, 14:25 by baloo@ursamundi.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 5:25 AM Jan Michel <<a href="mailto:jan@mueschelsoft.de" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">jan@mueschelsoft.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>Hi,<br></div><div> where do you see a problem here? The current situation might not be <br></div><div> perfect, but it is usable as it is. The only thing to keep in mind is <br></div><div> that the number of "lanes" does not need to match the number of entries <br></div><div> in the "XY:lanes" tags.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That disagrees with literally every lane editing and validation tool in existence at this time.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Can you give examples of validation tools and lane editing software that disagrees<br></div><div>with it?<br></div><div><br></div><div>The proper solution would be to make tag traffic_lanes or something that<br></div><div>would count also bicycle lanes, not redefine lane tag.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>