<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 14, 2020, 22:03 by anders@torger.se:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Ok, understood. However as far as I know OSM lacks a standard document <br></div><div>for render implementors to actually know how data should be interpreted.<br></div></blockquote><div>In part it is <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/</a> in part it is decision of<br></div><div>authors of map style how they want map data to be intererpreted.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>The only reason I get here is when the OSM wiki doesn't have answers<br></div></blockquote><div>Yes, you are raising some very interesting cases (for example case of mountain<br></div><div>and peaks named separately).<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Even here there are various answers and ideas circulating<br></div></blockquote><div>This is whole point of tagging mailing list for features with no known<br></div><div>good way of tagging them. (or where it is not documented)<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>