<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">15 dec. 2020 kl. 08:26 skrev Anders Torger <<a href="mailto:anders@torger.se" class="">anders@torger.se</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta charset="UTF-8" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Verdana, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">And about wetlands, couldn't those be just rendered on top of forests so we didn't have to make these complex multipolygons?<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">It does make sense to have overlapping wetland and forest, though. To take a swedish example: down here in 08-land (note to non-Swedes: Stockholm, telephone area code 08 :-) ), we get very little open bog, but a fair amount of soggy forest.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>