<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Dec 18, 2020, 17:44 by simon@poole.ch:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>addr:floor is an address tag and used in -(postal)-addresses-
when the floor is customarily or required to be included.<br></p><p>level:ref is a SIT tag used to indicate the name (or other
numbering) of a level contrary to the zero based number of the
level tag.<br></p><p>While both level:ref and addr:floor can have the same value,
semantically they are different<br></p></blockquote><div>Thanks for clarification! Though as far as I know in practice level tag in some regions is used<br></div><div>with 1 assigned to ground floor (I am not sure whatever to consider this as a tagging mistake <br></div><div>or not).<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>replacing level:ref with
addr:floor which is what you were suggesting with what boils down
to a mechanical edit with SC, will break SIT tagged buildings.<br></div></blockquote><div>To be clear, I was not suggesting replacing either tag with another.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And if <a href="https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/1487" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/1487</a><br></div><div>would be implemented it would be adding new tags to objects where<br></div><div>level tag is tagged. It would not be "upgrade tags" wikifiddling.<br></div><div><br></div><div> if I would implementit it would not delete any existing ones.<br></div><div>Objects tagged already with level:ref or addr:floor or level would be skipped<br></div><div>and this quest would not apply to them.<br></div><div>In this case resurvey with StreetComplete is pointless<br></div><div>(unlike case of opening hours), objects such as shops in general do<br></div><div>not move between floors while keeping their lat/lon position.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Am 18.12.2020 um 14:01 schrieb Mateusz
Konieczny via Tagging:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>1) this edits were not intended as changing anything but to
document current tagging<br></div><div>practice<br></div><div><div><br></div></div><div>2) how Simple Indoor Tagging is being broken by either of
this tags?<br></div><div><div><br></div></div><div>3) If SIT is broken by that tags, how it can be avoided?
Recommending to use <br></div><div>level tag together with either of this two?<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 18, 2020, 13:34 by <a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">simon@poole.ch</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><p>This doesn't make any sense outside of trying breaking the
SIT tagging scheme If you have changes to suggest do that in
the context of an SIT improvement and not just so that you
can add yet another SC challenge.<br></p><div class="">Am 18.12.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>I heavily edited <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:floor</a><br></div><div>and created <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level:ref</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Please, edit this pages if something can be improved.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Review of this pages also would be welcomed.<br></div><div><br></div><div>(edits triggered by <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/1487">https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/1487</a><br></div><div>and done as part of survey of a tagging situation before
a potential implementation)<br></div><div><br></div><pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br></pre></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br></pre></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>