<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 20, 2020, 01:18 by pla16021@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 23:58, <<a href="mailto:80hnhtv4agou@bk.ru" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">80hnhtv4agou@bk.ru</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div>it had the word bump in it.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, it had the word "bump" in it. "Bump" is an English word. There<br></div><div>are traffic-calming devices with the word "bump" in their name.<br></div><div><br></div><div>The proposal talks of "bumbs." "Bumb" is not an English word. I<br></div><div>cannot find any traffic-calming device with "bumb" in their name.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It's bumP versus bumB. One is a word. The other is not a word<br></div><div>but is in the proposal. Twice.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>I assumed that it is typo and changed bumb to bump<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>