<div dir="ltr">I am specifically referring to apartment complexes that are hyphenated address now, but are also a range.<div><br></div><div>I.e. 99-100 through 99-200 might have 99-100, 99-102, 99-104... etc.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:15 PM ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>What do you mean by this? You would have to tag with addr:range=no, as that is not a default value.<br></div><div><br></div><div>However, don't see this as a downside. Currently, software such as OSMand interprets hypenated addresses as a range anyway, so requirement to tag addr:range=no would be a benefit.<br></div><div><br></div><div>IpswichMapper</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div> <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>21 Dec 2020, 18:27 by <a href="mailto:zelonewolf@gmail.com" target="_blank">zelonewolf@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><div dir="ltr"><div>Would this work for addressing schemes that use a hyphenated prefix?<br></div><div><br></div><div>In Hawaii, addresses outside of the city of Honolulu use a two-digit prefix in addresses to determine which sector of the island an address is located. So an address might be something like "99-123 Kamehameha Highway". Would this scheme work for an apartment complex that's addressed something like 99-100 through 99-200 <Street Name>?<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 1:15 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>I like this new tag.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I had proposing something like that on my TODO list.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I added it in <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96211869#map=17/50.07743/19.93381&layers=N" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96211869</a><br></div><div>to mark addr:housenumber=1-3 as a single address, not a range<br></div><div>(based on survey that I remember well)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 21, 2020, 19:05 by <a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><div>Okay. In this case I can rename to proposal page to "addr:range".<br></div><div><br></div><div>This new tag:<br></div><div><br></div><div>- applies to nodes and closed ways that have addr:housenumber<br></div><div>- "addr:range=n" means every nth house is counted in a range<br></div><div>- "addr:range=even/odd" means every even/odd house is counted<br></div><div>- "addr:range=all" means every house is counted (default value for a housenumber tag with a hyphen in it if no range is given).<br></div><div>- "addr:range=no" means that the housenumber tag is NOT a range of values but rather a single housenumber.<br></div><div><br></div><div>"addr:range=all" is the default because that is what the wiki says and what software like streetcomplete suggests. Many buildings with multiple housenumbers are tagged like this.<br></div><div><br></div><div>However, software can create different defaults for different countries. For example, in the UK a hypenated address most probably means a range of even/odd addresses (so "addr:range=2")<br></div><div><br></div><div>What are your thoughts on this?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Also, I had linked the talk-gb thread, which discusses how addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes is already standard. That is the problem with suggesting a new tag. This proposal would now require informing multiple mappers to switch up the taggong scheme.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br></div><div>IpswichMapper<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>21 Dec 2020, 15:19 by <a href="mailto:lonvia@denofr.de" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">lonvia@denofr.de</a>:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(147,163,184);padding-left:10px;margin-left:5px"><div>On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 02:37:08PM +0100, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:interpolation_on_closed_ways_and_nodes</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Quick proposal I just created to accept this form of tagging. This follows from a discussion on the Talk-GB mailing list.<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-December/025553.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-December/025553.html</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Please comment if there are issues with accepting this form of tagging.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I dislike this kind of tagging to the point that I've refused to<br></div><div>support it in Nominatim in the past. See<br></div><div><a href="https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/565" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/osm-search/Nominatim/issues/565</a> for the full disucssion.<br></div><div><br></div><div>The problem is that it makes the interpretation of addr:housenumber and<br></div><div>addr:interpolation dependent on the presence of another tag.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Note that addr:housenumber=40-48 can be a valid housenumber. Example:<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285077586" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285077586</a> So to know if the tag needs<br></div><div>to be interpreted as a single housenumber or as a housenumber range<br></div><div>you need to check if the node/way has a addr:interpolation tag in addtion<br></div><div>to the addr:housenumber tag.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Similarly, a way with addr:interpolation needs to be processed in two<br></div><div>different ways: If a addr:housenumber is present, then assume it's a<br></div><div>building and parse the addr:housenumber tag to get the range. If no<br></div><div>housenumber is on the way, assume it is a good old interpolation line<br></div><div>and look at the housenumbers along the nodes of the way.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I find this kind of double meaning for tagging confusing and error-prone.<br></div><div>But I might be fighting wind mills here.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Sarah<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div><a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Tagging mailing list<br></div><div> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>