<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 26, 2020, 23:01 by zelonewolf@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>At this point in OSM, IMO we shouldn't mark anything deprecated short of an approved proposal to do so.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>What about tags with barely any use and not documented?<br></div><div>Especially ones with clear alternatives?<br></div><div><br></div><div>For example lets say that someone added many cases of oneway=true (maybe via <br></div><div>import?).<br></div><div><br></div><div>I think that it would be OK to create page documenting it as deprecated duplicate of<br></div><div>oneway=yes, without going though full proposal process.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If for some reason sklep=warzywniak (Polish for shop=greengrocer) would become<br></div><div>commonly used (or someone even created wiki page for it) it would be OK to<br></div><div>mark it as deprecated without wasting time on a proposal process.<br></div> </body>
</html>