<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>In my mapping I use variant B, though<br></div><div>for the first line I would ignore such tiny areas <br></div><div>(and would not ignore larger ones).<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am not sure is it common or just me.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Dec 26, 2020, 00:17 by supaplex@riseup.net:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>Is there actually a consensus on whether a highway line should
always run in the middle of a road - i.e. represent the road as a
physical object - or whether it should rather follow the line of
travel of the vehicles on the road? The driving line of the
vehicles can differ from the centre line due to various
circumstances: e.g. due to (structurally created) chicanes, but
also, for example, due to parking lanes with parked vehicles...<br></p><p>It seems to me that there are two possibilities: Either the
highway line represents the roadway itself, or it represents the
line of travel (and is thus in a sense a routing aid). I have
uploaded a graphic here to illustrate the problem: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Highway_representation.png" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Highway_representation.png</a><br></p><p>According to which of these variants must/could/should one map?<br></p><div>Alex<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>