<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 30. Dec 2020, at 23:17, Warin <61sundowner@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><p>The proposal sates <br>
</p>
<p>"<i>forest</i> is used in its main definition, i.e. a wooded land
managed to produce wood for human consumption and uses" </p></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>btw: is this the “main definition” of forest? Haven’t forests been here long before there were wo/men?</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></body></html>