<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>In some cases it can be, for example, if there is a huge open pit mine at a given location.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Or other feature that ensured that everything existing earlier was utterly obliterated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But for example, overgrown railway tracks that are still there may be missed even<br></div><div>from high quality aerial imagery.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 4, 2021, 22:54 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>I can accept local mappers being on the ground and despite looking hard (and asking who has originally added the thing to OSM) not finding any traces, to remove it, but I do not think it is acceptable to remove former railways because you can not identify them on aerial imagery. I think the documentation should be explicit here.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers<br></div><div>Martin<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>