<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>In my opinion we have no trouble with newbies ruining proposal process<br></div><div>and I see no reason for adding obstacles and verification process and to make<br></div><div>processing vote even more complicated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I would expect self-filtering to be sufficient.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Only tiny self-selected minority participates in proposal process, <br></div><div>I see no reason to make participation more complicated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am certainly not going to include such changes in this proposal and<br></div><div>will not make such proposal.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 6, 2021, 00:58 by jayandseth@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>Or why not just OSMF members? <br></div><div><ul><li>The Active Contributor Membership acts as a gateway and mapping days of one OSM account are accounted for.<br></li><li>Those who have a OSMF membership through a financial contribution (and may not map much) already have a vote in OSMF itself (the parent and way-more-important organization than tagging) and usually are experienced members of the community. <br></li><li>Members must be active yearly in order to maintain their membership.<br></li></ul><div>Who can vote being dependent on mapping experience alone is quite limiting. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Nomatter who is voting, everyone has the expectation of reading and questioning the proposal. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Every proposal should clarify what it is to do so that <i>anyone </i>can understand it when they decide to vote, no matter their mapping, tagging, or historical experience.<br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><a target="_blank" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lectrician1" rel="noopener noreferrer">lectrician1</a><br></div></div></div></div><div><br></div></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:45 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <<a href="mailto:graemefitz1@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">graemefitz1@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 06:21, Tomas Straupis <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:tomasstraupis@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">tomasstraupis@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><br></div><div> As mentioned earlier either we get a considerable portion of mappers<br></div><div> (not wikians) to vote (which is practically impossible),<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Definitely agree there, & even just for discussing proposals, let alone voting. <br></div><div><br></div><div>December was a <i>very</i> busy month on the tagging list, but only 93 people posted to it, & several of them were 1 post only<br></div><div><br></div><div><div>Thanks<br></div><div><br></div><div>Graeme<br></div></div><div><br></div></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Tagging mailing list<br></div><div> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>