<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 6, 2021, 13:45 by zelonewolf@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>Rather than eliminating voices, we should be focused on attracting more <br></div><div> voters and more diverse perspectives, ideally at the RFC stage, before <br></div><div> the vote. Perhaps if we work on making tagging proposals more organized <br></div><div> and discoverable, we can lessen the burden on proposers to canvass for <br></div><div> votes (which can skew any vote because our communication channels are so <br></div><div> fragmented).<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1<br></div><div><br></div><div>I dislike the fact that RFC and voting announcements are mixed with general discussion on the tagging list. I think many people prefer not to subscribe to the list because it is high volume, but would be interested in subscribing to a list that only has RFC/vote announcements. I would be in favor of a separate mailing list that people could subscribe to for just those announcements. The key would be moderating that list in such a way that only announcements are posted there while discussion still happens on tagging in the usual way.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>+1<br></div><div><br></div><div>It would also make easier to replicate announcements to other channels.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Though maybe page on wiki would be better for that?<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>