<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 9, 2021, 03:29 by graemefitz1@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div>Sorry, thought I had sent this yesterday but still sitting here<br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 19:08, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div><br></div><div>It would mean that if some bad idea was introduced just before vote noone would be allowed<br></div><div>to mention it in their vote.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Don't really think that would be an issue?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Let's say I've introduced a Proposal, put it to RFC, & spent 2 weeks answering everybody's comments & incorporating suggestions, so everybody is happy.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I then say it's going to Voting, but as part of the update to change the status, I also amend the proposal to add 6 other features, completely change the definitions & so on.<br></div><div><br></div><div>All that that is going to achieve is that everybody is going to quite correctly vote No, on the grounds that the proposal has been changed, & I've then wasted a few weeks time & effort :-(<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>I was responding to idea of restricting "no" votes to only reasons raised in RfC.<br></div> </body>
</html>