<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>This change to <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status</a><br></div><div>is now reverted.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 10, 2021, 11:21 by voschix@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>+1 <br></div><div>A single user should not deprecate a tag that is used 120k times in the database. For whatever reason.<br></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 11:18, Marc_marc <<a href="mailto:marc_marc@mailo.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">marc_marc@mailo.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>Le 10.01.21 à 10:50, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :<br></div><div> > Some objects like <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3158114573">https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3158114573</a><br></div><div> > are tagged with tags that I consider very problematic: operational_status=closed<br></div><div> <br></div><div> well, according to the proposal about this tag,<br></div><div> it's for temporary status, it is not a replacement for a life cycle tag.<br></div><div> a fire hydrant that is not operational for 6 months because there is<br></div><div> work on the pipeline 1km away, it is still a fire hydrant for the common<br></div><div> contributors, and the hydrant itself is not broken or abandoned when it<br></div><div> is temporarily not operational<br></div><div> <br></div><div> > <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operational_status</a><br></div><div> > was already described as "now discouraged", I added<br></div><div> > now also status=deprecated<br></div><div> <br></div><div> the interest of the operational_status tag was discussed in the fire<br></div><div> hydrant proposal.<br></div><div> Generally speaking, I find that the depreciation of a tag is in an<br></div><div> absurd situation: on the one hand a proposal is easily rejected if it<br></div><div> provides for the depreciation of a tag, on the other hand some<br></div><div> contributors depreciate a tag before any discussion.<br></div><div> the wiki loses value with this kind of behavior. we should discuss<br></div><div> *before* a change of status, not after.<br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div> _______________________________________________<br></div><div> Tagging mailing list<br></div><div> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>