<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 14, 2021, 12:44 by stefan.tauner@gmx.at:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:54:11 +0100<br></div><div>Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 11:36 Uhr schrieb Stefan Tauner <<br></div><div>stefan.tauner@gmx.at>: <br></div><div><br></div><div>><br></div><div>><br></div><div>> PS: I would never tag "smooth paving stones with seamless connections"<br></div><div>> as excellent. At least none I have ever seen. <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>here you are:<br></div><div>https://notiziaoggi.it/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/32474918_portici-piazza-italia-gattinara-da-rifare.jpg<br></div><div>http://www.ocrarossa.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/mosaico-via-cernaia-torino1.jpg<br></div><div>(not paving stones actually, but stone and optimal smoothness)<br></div><div>http://www.comune.genova.it/sites/default/files/imagecache/immagine_dettaglio_articolo/documenti/immagini/articoli/mosaici_0.jpg<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not paving stones as defined by the wiki[1] IMHO - but I don't think we<br></div><div>have a better tagging for them.<br></div><div>If smoothness would be more widely used I guess they would fit<br></div><div>surface=paving_stones and smoothness=excellent, yes. However, I think<br></div><div>these should get a separate value, e.g., polished_stone.<br></div><div><br></div><div>1: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones</a><br></div></blockquote><div>IMHO it fits definition and even one of example images.<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>