<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 18, 2021, 01:49 by mnalis-openstreetmaplist@voyager.hr:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 10:41:24 -0500, Alan Mackie <aamackie@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 10:14, Tobias Zwick <osm@westnordost.de> wrote:<br></div><blockquote>The discussion has been revolving around earthquakes in Croatia mostly,<br></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks Tobias, talk has indeed mostly converged on only one half of the question<br></div><div>posted (so far). I'll try in this subthread to help focus on SC case exclusively.<br></div></blockquote><div>Personally I have no problem with tag indicating that according to survey there<br></div><div>is no house number for given building.<br></div><div><br></div><div>So for example building=yes representing garage would end with<br></div><div><br></div><div>building=yes<br></div><div>noaddress=yes<br></div><div><br></div><div>And repeat for 200 nearby garage building and sheds.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Or, if 100% certainty (does such even exist in life, much less in OSM?) was <br></div><div>an absolute requirement for "noaddress=yes", then value "noaddress=probably"<br></div><div>or something similar might be considered as an option?<br></div></blockquote><div>address:signed=no?<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><blockquote><div>1. could get tedious very quickly in areas with many separate garages sheds<br></div><div>etc., I presume this is why the address query is normally suppressed until<br></div><div>after building type ID in the first place.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It would be choice for user - while the default in SC currently is to map<br></div><div>firstly building type and (some time later) the address; the user which<br></div><div>wanted to focus only on important tags might want to reverse that order <br></div><div>(or even to skip building type quest altogether).<br></div></blockquote><div>And right now it is not really possible - SC will not ask address quest for building=yes,<br></div><div>one of main reasons is avoiding of adding noaddress=yes on sheds/garages/etc<br></div><div>tagged as building=yes<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>[A] There are multiple problems and reasons why person might not want to map<br></div><div> explicit building type via "building" key: it might not be easy or<br></div><div> possible to know what was original purpose of the building was: <br></div><div> Was it originally built as a hangar, or a garage, or a shed or a<br></div><div> warehouse?<br></div></blockquote><div>If it is not visible at all (building heavily reconstructed so that it<br></div><div>changed form) then tagging current form is OK.<br></div><div><br></div><div>- factory building completely reconstructed into apartments is building=apartments<br></div><div>- factory building housing museum with building shape/style/substance remaining<br></div><div>is building=factory (or building=industrial or...)<br></div><div>- apartments building used as place of worship is building=apartments <br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>