<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 23, 2021, 16:00 by newsspeak11@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:53 PM Brian M. Sperlongano <<a href="mailto:zelonewolf@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">zelonewolf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"> <br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div>I would not include trunks as runnable roads. Can you please give an<br></div><div> example where "it is just fine to run along the shoulders of trunk<br></div><div> roads"?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sure.<br></div><div><br></div><div>This is a road tagged highway=trunk I personally ran along a week ago:<br></div><div><a target="_blank" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604426860" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604426860</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Here's a photo of what it looks like:<br></div><div><a target="_blank" href="https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.476725088471085&lng=-71.46051362163524&z=17&pKey=HvSsAR0kHaiH4ILu-FCgZA&focus=photo" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.476725088471085&lng=-71.46051362163524&z=17&pKey=HvSsAR0kHaiH4ILu-FCgZA&focus=photo</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>There is a nice wide shoulder there, and it is no problem to run along it even with traffic going by at 80kph.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is an interesting example as I would NOT feel comfortable walking/running along this type of road. I also live in the US, but I would prefer to use a different route, if possible. <br></div><div><br></div><div>I suppose I consider foot=yes roads to have sidewalks, desire paths, or roads with low traffic volume. However, I do live in an urban area where these features are ubiquitous. <br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>And that is exactly why using foot=yes/no for legal access is preferable.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Different people will have different standards what counts as "reasonable for pedestrian use".<br></div> </body>
</html>