<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 26, 2021, 19:26 by michael.montani@un.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> >> a place that has no name should not have a place=* object.<br></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div> <br></div><div> Yes, I definetely cannot understand this sentence. Could you elaborate? To me, only place=locality without name=* wouldn't make any sense, but place!=locality without name=* would be fine (even in case the name doesn't actually exist), because it's describing
a human settlment. <br></div></div></blockquote><div>I can imagine a theorethical case of place=town that has no name, but is it something that<br></div><div>ever happened in the entire history of the world?<br></div><div><br></div><div>For some place=* types I would say that name is fundamental, for example<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.07778&mlon=19.85830#map=17/50.07778/19.85830">https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.07778&mlon=19.85830#map=17/50.07778/19.85830</a><br></div><div>is not taggable as place=isolated_dwelling simply because it has name<br></div><div><br></div><div>similarly place=city_block that is not named is inherently not taggable:<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.06304&mlon=19.93777#map=18/50.06304/19.93777">https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.06304&mlon=19.93777#map=18/50.06304/19.93777</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>place=suburb is inherently a distinct named part of the city, unnamed part of the city<br></div><div>is not a place=suburb<br></div> </body>
</html>