<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 26, 2021, 18:30 by marc_marc@mailo.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Le 26.01.21 à 18:01, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :<br></div><blockquote><div>Well, with an object count that small, it would be trivial do the edit<br></div><div>with a sparse overpass query into JOSM on a single changeset<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>it is indeed my intention to propose it, but as Mateusz points out,<br></div><div>mechanical mass editions with a worldwide scope are sometimes discussed<br></div><div>on the principle "why do it since it will disappear automatically in X<br></div><div>years ?".<br></div><div>that's why I wanted to do in order: discussion, wiki, local edition<br></div><div>where I know that this kind of proposal is likely to succeed,<br></div><div>and then possibly propose a worldwide edition.<br></div></blockquote><div>In my experience country-level bot edit proposals attract less people with<br></div><div>comments "I am against any automated edits, also this one" or<br></div><div>"I am against this edit, as it will change last edit date of many objects".<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>