<html><head></head><body>Agreed that leisure=winter_sports instead of landuse would avoid the usual drama associated with the later.<br><br>But, given the very slow pace of mapping such areas, I would advocate against depreciating, discouraging or whatever.<br>(>4400 at skimaps.org, <a href="http://www.opensnowmap.org/qa/OSM_vs_skimap_missing_at_OSM/)">http://www.opensnowmap.org/qa/OSM_vs_skimap_missing_at_OSM/)</a>. <br><br>Maybe a rationale is needed, so here's one: during winter where this tag is most useful, hopefully snow covers everything and summertime landuse is not that used anymore, hence the overlap/intersection.<br>Yves - Opensnowmap <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 6 février 2021 10:20:07 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre dir="auto" class="k9mail">On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 10:08:36 +0100 (CET)<br>Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Which rule? landuse=* polygons may overlap<br><br>(landuse=flowerbed inside landuse=industrial inside landuse=military<br>that partially overlaps with landuse=forest is a valid tagging,<br>even if I would select different key for landuse=flowerbed)<br></blockquote><br>No, the ways themselves should not overlap. One area might be enclosed<br>by another one. The better word than overlap would have been intersect.<br>Just like with outers of MPs.<br><div class="k9mail-signature">-- <br>Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner<hr>Tagging mailing list<br>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></div></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>