<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I could live with historic=ogham_stone. <br>
</p>
<p>It's just a pity that it'll be at least another 4 weeks until
this will be approved, if it is approved this time, when this
would make such a nice YouTube tutorial for my series. But better
get it right first, before spreading the gospel.</p>
<p>About the ref thing: Yes, it is very in depth tagging and doesn't
need to be part of the proposal. I want to use the ref tag to be
able to link to the Ogham in 3D page, like we do with mapillary ID
and wikidata. They don't have all Ogham stones in their database,
so we can't generically use the name to create the link.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 07/02/2021 um 20:43 schrieb Yves via
Tagging:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:09DF3700-8108-408F-897A-3D3D291B7906@mailbox.org">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
IMHO, it's the complete tag key=value that convey the meaning, no
need to be so much restricted by a former key.<br>
But historic=* is okay too. <br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>