<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. I really don't know about <font
face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone</font> vs <font
face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone_type</font>. There
is no wiki page for <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone</font>,
that's why I didn't choose it. I don't think I can be expected to
suggest using keys that don't exist in the wiki.</p>
<p>b-unicycling<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 07/02/2021 um 17:58 schrieb Jan
Michel:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:rvp9nb$tlq$1@ciao.gmane.io">Hi,
<br>
I suggest to keep the proposal simple. That is, describe the main
goal (introducing stone_type=ogham_stone), add a few relevant
links to other tags (e.g. Key:inscription). Add a short
explanation, why you chose to use stone_type instead of stone
(because of current use of both keys strongly suggested that).
<br>
Don't merge too many things into one proposal. There's always one
special aspect one person doesn't like and that makes them vote
against.
<br>
<br>
Your basic proposal, to have a tag for Ogham stones would have
been clearly approved if either the '_type' aspect or the
inscription:* aspect had been missing.
<br>
<br>
Regarding your idea of adding references to an external database -
this could be done, but please use some standard tags.
ref:ogham=NUMBER_OR_NAME would be a reasonable way.
<br>
But don't include it in the proposal of your primary key - there's
always a few voters who don't like external references (for good
reasons) and, combined with others, let the proposal fail.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Jan
<br>
<br>
On 07.02.21 16:05, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">It looks like it might not get approved,
so I'll have to adapt the proposal to try and get a better
standard. A resource has come to my attention that could add
more value. I'll just copy and paste what I put on the
discussion page, in case people don't find it there:
<br>
</blockquote>
If we had a tag ogham_in_3d:ref
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"> to add the name, the link could be
displayed similarly to how the
<br>
wikipedia or mapillary links work.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Tagging mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>